SCGMA Technical Bulletin – Laminated Glass and Low E Coatings

Occasionally, risk elements present themselves in the commercial glazing business, and we believe that it is helpful to address them. Rejection of installed laminated Low E glazing due to subtle color shifts has been an issue and is the subject of this technical bulletin.

There are several influences that determine a laminated glass makeup, including the placement of Low E coatings in the overall unit.

When using a monolithic Low E laminated glass make up, it would be likely that the coating would be embedded between glass layers on the #2 or #3 surface. Placing the Low-E coating inside the laminate will help prevent damage while maintaining the solar heat gain coefficient of the coating. Performance will vary based upon the coating placement.

When using a Low E laminated insulated glass unit, it is most common to have the coatings applied to the #2 surface, followed by an airspace and an inboard laminated. Alternatively, coatings can be embedded on an outboard laminate between the glass layers on the #2 or #3 surface, followed by an airspace and inboard monolithic glass. Again, performance will vary based upon the coating placement.

Embedding the Low-E coating next to the interlayer has the potential to affect the optical properties of the laminated glass. Low-E coatings are designed for use in IG units with argon or air next to the coating, so placing them in contact with the laminate’s interlayer may cause a shift in color. The extent of any color shift is dependent on several factors including the choice of coating used and whether that coating is on surface #2 or surface #3 of the laminate. Therefore, IG units with Low E coatings embedded inside the laminate may not match units with the same Low-E exposed to the IG airspace. Color shift when using embedded Low-E coatings in laminated glass is not considered a product defect, but has caused architectural rejection of installed products.

Glass samples are typically submitted for architectural approval, but since the color shift is subtle, many times it is difficult to detect. In the submittal process, we encourage contractors to protect themselves by informing all parties of the potential color volatility, and expanding the viewing to include larger samples in exterior conditions.

Click here to view the SCGMA Technical Bulletin as a PDF. 

Recent Posts

SCGMA YPG Event Recap – Arcadia Inc. Tour

On Friday, June 3rd, the SCGMA Young Professionals Group held their second quarterly event of 2022 – a tour of Arcadia Inc. A record attendance of 38 YPG members joined to learn more about architectural glazing building products – how…

June 21, 2022

Employee Retention Credit

The Employee Retention Credit  (ERC), is a fully refundable tax credit for a percentage of the qualified wages paid to employees. It’s applied to an employer’s federal payroll tax liability and any excess credit is refundable. It was created in…

May 5, 2022

SCGMA Attends the Glass & Glazing Forum!

The Finishing Trades Institute of Southern California, in collaboration with the American Institute of Architects (AIA), hosted its first Glass & Glazing Forum on April 14, 2022, at the new Apprenticeship Training Center in Commerce. The forum offered architects the…

April 28, 2022

SCGMA Technical Bulletin – Building Movement and How Glazing Systems Can Best Accommodate Them

The performance of the exterior façade not only depends upon the systems, but also the ability of the systems to accommodate movement of the structure and still perform. In addition, it is the responsibility of all façade contractors to coordinate…

April 11, 2022

SCGMA Case Study – 101 South Marengo Office

The definition of Adaptive Reuse is the process of reusing an existing building for a purpose other than which it was originally built or designed for. Adaptive reuse of buildings can be an attractive alternative to new construction in terms…

April 11, 2022